Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) is a critical step in understanding clinical data before formal modeling or hypothesis testing. In regulated clinical research, thorough exploration helps identify data issues, understand distributions, and guide analysis decisions.
3.1.1 EDA Goals in Clinical Research
Exploratory analysis in clinical settings serves several specific purposes:
Data quality assessment: Identifying issues that may have been missed during data cleaning
Understanding baseline characteristics: Examining the study population’s key features
Treatment pattern exploration: Visualizing medication adherence, dose adjustments, etc.
Outcome variable exploration: Understanding distribution and relationships with predictors
Informing modeling decisions: Guiding choices of statistical approaches
Generating hypotheses: Identifying unexpected relationships for further investigation
3.2 Descriptive Statistics for Clinical Data
3.2.1 Patient Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
A fundamental starting point is characterizing the study population:
# Calculate correlations between key variableslibrary(corrplot)library(corrr)# Select numeric variables of interestnumeric_vars <- clinical_data %>%select(age, bmi, systolic_bp, diastolic_bp, ldl_cholesterol, hdl_cholesterol, triglycerides, hba1c, creatinine, egfr) # Calculate correlation matrixcorr_matrix <-cor(numeric_vars, use ="pairwise.complete.obs")# Create correlation plotcorrplot(corr_matrix, method ="circle", type ="upper", tl.col ="black", tl.srt =45,diag =FALSE)# Alternative with corrr package for a tidy approachnumeric_vars %>%correlate() %>%rearrange() %>%shave(upper =TRUE) %>%rplot(print_cor =TRUE)
3.3.2 Exploring Bivariate Relationships
Visualizing relationships between pairs of variables:
Code
# Create scatter plots with regression lines by treatmentggplot(clinical_data, aes(x = baseline_value, y = endpoint_value, color = treatment_group)) +geom_point(alpha =0.6) +geom_smooth(method ="lm", se =TRUE) +facet_wrap(~treatment_group) +labs(title ="Relationship Between Baseline and Endpoint Values",subtitle ="By Treatment Group",x ="Baseline Value", y ="Endpoint Value") +theme_minimal()# Relationship between continuous and categorical variableggplot(clinical_data, aes(x = age_category, y = endpoint_value, fill = age_category)) +geom_boxplot() +facet_wrap(~treatment_group) +labs(title ="Endpoint Values by Age Category and Treatment",x ="Age Category", y ="Endpoint Value") +theme_minimal() +theme(legend.position ="none")
3.3.3 Stratified Analysis
Examining outcome patterns across key subgroups:
Code
# Forest plot for treatment effect across subgroupslibrary(meta)library(forestplot)# For demonstration (in practice would be calculated from the data)subgroup_results <-tibble(subgroup =c("Overall", "Male", "Female", "Age < 65", "Age ≥ 65", "With Comorbidity", "Without Comorbidity"),n_treatment =c(150, 80, 70, 90, 60, 85, 65),n_control =c(150, 78, 72, 92, 58, 82, 68),mean_diff =c(12.3, 14.2, 10.1, 15.7, 8.4, 11.2, 13.5),lower_ci =c(8.7, 9.5, 5.2, 10.3, 3.1, 6.4, 8.9),upper_ci =c(15.9, 18.9, 15.0, 21.1, 13.7, 16.0, 18.1))# Create a forest plotforestplot(labeltext = subgroup_results$subgroup,mean = subgroup_results$mean_diff,lower = subgroup_results$lower_ci,upper = subgroup_results$upper_ci,xlab ="Treatment Effect (95% CI)",zero =0,boxsize =0.2,lineheight =unit(1, "cm"),col =fpColors(box ="#0072B2", line ="#0072B2", summary ="#D55E00"))
Examining relationships between categorical variables:
Code
# Create contingency tablecontingency_table <-table(clinical_data$response_category, clinical_data$treatment_group)# Print table with chi-square testknitr::kable(contingency_table, caption ="Response Category by Treatment Group")# Chi-square testchi_result <-chisq.test(contingency_table)chi_result# Visualize with mosaic plotlibrary(vcd)mosaic(contingency_table,main ="Response Category by Treatment Group",shade =TRUE)# Alternative visualization with ggplotggplot(clinical_data, aes(x = treatment_group, fill = response_category)) +geom_bar(position ="fill") +labs(title ="Response Categories by Treatment Group",x ="Treatment Group", y ="Proportion",fill ="Response Category") +scale_fill_brewer(palette ="Set2") +theme_minimal()
3.6 Exploring Adverse Events
Specialized visualization for safety data:
Code
# Prepare adverse event dataae_summary <- adverse_events %>%group_by(system_organ_class, preferred_term, treatment_group) %>%summarise(n_events =n(),n_subjects =n_distinct(subject_id),.groups ="drop" ) %>%# Get total subjects per treatment groupleft_join( adverse_events %>%distinct(subject_id, treatment_group) %>%count(treatment_group, name ="total_subjects"),by ="treatment_group" ) %>%# Calculate percentagesmutate(percent = (n_subjects / total_subjects) *100 ) %>%# Filter for more common AEsfilter(n_subjects >=5) %>%arrange(system_organ_class, desc(n_subjects))# Create adverse event plotggplot(ae_summary, aes(x =reorder(preferred_term, percent), y = percent, fill = treatment_group)) +geom_col(position ="dodge") +coord_flip() +facet_wrap(~system_organ_class, scales ="free_y") +labs(title ="Adverse Events by Treatment Group",subtitle ="Events occurring in ≥5 subjects",x ="", y ="Percentage of Subjects (%)",fill ="Treatment Group") +theme_minimal()
3.7 Interactive Exploration
For complex clinical data, interactive tools can be valuable:
Code
library(plotly)library(DT)# Create interactive scatter plotp <-ggplot(clinical_data, aes(x = age, y = endpoint_value, color = treatment_group,text =paste("Subject ID:", subject_id,"\nAge:", age,"\nSex:", sex,"\nBaseline:", baseline_value,"\nEndpoint:", endpoint_value,"\nChange:", endpoint_value - baseline_value ))) +geom_point(alpha =0.7) +labs(title ="Relationship Between Age and Endpoint Value",x ="Age (years)", y ="Endpoint Value") +theme_minimal()# Convert to interactive plotlyggplotly(p, tooltip ="text")# Interactive data tabledatatable( clinical_data %>%select(subject_id, age, sex, treatment_group, baseline_value, endpoint_value, change = endpoint_value - baseline_value),filter ="top",options =list(pageLength =10,autoWidth =TRUE,scrollX =TRUE ))
3.8 Exercises
Create a comprehensive baseline characteristics table for a clinical trial dataset.
Explore the distribution of a primary efficacy endpoint across different demographic subgroups.
Visualize the correlation between laboratory parameters in a longitudinal study.
Create a Kaplan-Meier plot for time-to-event data and explore differences between treatment groups.
Design a dashboard for exploratory analysis of adverse events from a clinical trial.
3.9 Summary
Exploratory data analysis is a critical step in clinical research that informs data quality assessment, understanding of the study population, and guides subsequent formal analyses. Using R’s tidyverse ecosystem along with specialized packages like gtsummary, survival, and plotly provides powerful tools for visualizing and summarizing clinical data. The insights gained during EDA not only help identify potential data issues but also inform hypothesis generation and modeling decisions in the analytical stages that follow.
In clinical research specifically, EDA serves an additional role in regulatory documentation, as these explorations often form the basis for determining analysis populations, addressing protocol deviations, and establishing the robustness of efficacy and safety conclusions.